On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:24:56AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: > So, like, the other day Scott Wood mumbled: > > > > > > Can I ask; what is the intended usage of such a thing? How large > > > would a typical binary blob be? > > > > I use it for embedding guest device trees in a hypervisor's device tree. > > Why wouldn't we instead, say, extend the source sytax > to allow a sub-tree or an embedded tree, rather than > obscuring an opaque form of that guest device tree?
That was what I tried initially, but the implementation was much more complicated, and path references are problematic. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
