From: Cyril Bur <cyril...@gmail.com> tm_reclaim_thread() doesn't use the parameter anymore, both callers have to bother getting it as they have no need for a struct thread_info either.
It was previously used but became unused in dc3106690b20 ("powerpc: tm: Always use fp_state and vr_state to store live registers") Just remove it and adjust the callers. Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril...@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <lei...@debian.org> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c index 6b73d74793c2..061a1c4cb3a8 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c @@ -860,8 +860,7 @@ static inline bool tm_enabled(struct task_struct *tsk) return tsk && tsk->thread.regs && (tsk->thread.regs->msr & MSR_TM); } -static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr, - struct thread_info *ti, uint8_t cause) +static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr, uint8_t cause) { /* * Use the current MSR TM suspended bit to track if we have @@ -908,7 +907,7 @@ static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr, void tm_reclaim_current(uint8_t cause) { tm_enable(); - tm_reclaim_thread(¤t->thread, current_thread_info(), cause); + tm_reclaim_thread(¤t->thread, cause); } static inline void tm_reclaim_task(struct task_struct *tsk) @@ -939,7 +938,7 @@ static inline void tm_reclaim_task(struct task_struct *tsk) thr->regs->ccr, thr->regs->msr, thr->regs->trap); - tm_reclaim_thread(thr, task_thread_info(tsk), TM_CAUSE_RESCHED); + tm_reclaim_thread(thr, TM_CAUSE_RESCHED); TM_DEBUG("--- tm_reclaim on pid %d complete\n", tsk->pid); -- 2.16.3