We recently added the __printf attribute to prom_printf(), which means
GCC started warning about type/format mismatches. As part of that
commit we changed some "%lx" formats to "%llx" where the type is
actually unsigned long long.

Unfortunately prom_printf() doesn't know how to print "%llx", it just
prints a literal "lx", eg:

  reserved memory map:
    lx - lx
    lx - lx

We should fix that at some point, but for now just cast the relevant
values to unsigned long to get things printing again. On 64-bit that
has no effect on the output, because both types are 64-bit wide. On
32-bit it means we're potentially not printing the high 32-bits of
some values, but most of them are pointers anyway, and we've lived
with that behaviour up until now.

Fixes: eae5f709a4d7 ("powerpc: Add __printf verification to prom_printf")
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c
index 425992e393bc..662dd68c3fb8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c
@@ -1580,7 +1580,7 @@ static void __init prom_instantiate_opal(void)
                return;
        }
 
-       prom_printf("instantiating opal at 0x%llx...", base);
+       prom_printf("instantiating opal at 0x%lx...", (unsigned long)base);
 
        if (call_prom_ret("call-method", 4, 3, rets,
                          ADDR("load-opal-runtime"),
@@ -1596,10 +1596,10 @@ static void __init prom_instantiate_opal(void)
 
        reserve_mem(base, size);
 
-       prom_debug("opal base     = 0x%llx\n", base);
-       prom_debug("opal align    = 0x%llx\n", align);
-       prom_debug("opal entry    = 0x%llx\n", entry);
-       prom_debug("opal size     = 0x%llx\n", size);
+       prom_debug("opal base     = 0x%lx\n", (unsigned long)base);
+       prom_debug("opal align    = 0x%lx\n", (unsigned long)align);
+       prom_debug("opal entry    = 0x%lx\n", (unsigned long)entry);
+       prom_debug("opal size     = 0x%lx\n", (unsigned long)size);
 
        prom_setprop(opal_node, "/ibm,opal", "opal-base-address",
                     &base, sizeof(base));
@@ -1734,7 +1734,7 @@ static void __init prom_instantiate_sml(void)
        if (base == 0)
                prom_panic("Could not allocate memory for sml\n");
 
-       prom_printf("instantiating sml at 0x%llx...", base);
+       prom_printf("instantiating sml at 0x%lx...", (unsigned long)base);
 
        memset((void *)base, 0, size);
 
@@ -1753,7 +1753,7 @@ static void __init prom_instantiate_sml(void)
        prom_setprop(ibmvtpm_node, "/vdevice/vtpm", "linux,sml-size",
                     &size, sizeof(size));
 
-       prom_debug("sml base     = 0x%llx\n", base);
+       prom_debug("sml base     = 0x%lx\n", (unsigned long)base);
        prom_debug("sml size     = 0x%x\n", size);
 
        prom_debug("prom_instantiate_sml: end...\n");
@@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@ static void __init prom_initialize_tce_table(void)
 
                prom_debug("TCE table: %s\n", path);
                prom_debug("\tnode = 0x%x\n", node);
-               prom_debug("\tbase = 0x%llx\n", base);
+               prom_debug("\tbase = 0x%lx\n", (unsigned long)base);
                prom_debug("\tsize = 0x%x\n", minsize);
 
                /* Initialize the table to have a one-to-one mapping
@@ -2559,9 +2559,9 @@ static void __init flatten_device_tree(void)
                int i;
                prom_printf("reserved memory map:\n");
                for (i = 0; i < mem_reserve_cnt; i++)
-                       prom_printf("  %llx - %llx\n",
-                                   be64_to_cpu(mem_reserve_map[i].base),
-                                   be64_to_cpu(mem_reserve_map[i].size));
+                       prom_printf("  %lx - %lx\n",
+                                   (unsigned 
long)be64_to_cpu(mem_reserve_map[i].base),
+                                   (unsigned 
long)be64_to_cpu(mem_reserve_map[i].size));
        }
 #endif
        /* Bump mem_reserve_cnt to cause further reservations to fail
-- 
2.14.1

Reply via email to