On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 02:04:10PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
[snip]
> OK good, in commit:
> 
> c17b98cf6028 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Remove code for PPC970 processors") (Dec 
> 2014)
> 
> So we should be able to do the patch below.
> 
> cheers
> 
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h 
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 17498e9a26e4..7756b0c6da75 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -269,7 +269,6 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>       unsigned long host_lpcr;
>       unsigned long sdr1;
>       unsigned long host_sdr1;
> -     int tlbie_lock;
>       unsigned long lpcr;
>       unsigned long vrma_slb_v;
>       int mmu_ready;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c
> index 78e6a392330f..89d909b3b881 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c
> @@ -434,24 +434,6 @@ static inline int is_mmio_hpte(unsigned long v, unsigned 
> long r)
>               (HPTE_R_KEY_HI | HPTE_R_KEY_LO));
>  }
>  
> -static inline int try_lock_tlbie(unsigned int *lock)
> -{
> -     unsigned int tmp, old;
> -     unsigned int token = LOCK_TOKEN;
> -
> -     asm volatile("1:lwarx   %1,0,%2\n"
> -                  "  cmpwi   cr0,%1,0\n"
> -                  "  bne     2f\n"
> -                  "  stwcx.  %3,0,%2\n"
> -                  "  bne-    1b\n"
> -                  "  isync\n"
> -                  "2:"
> -                  : "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (old)
> -                  : "r" (lock), "r" (token)
> -                  : "cc", "memory");
> -     return old == 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void do_tlbies(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rbvalues,
>                     long npages, int global, bool need_sync)
>  {
> @@ -463,8 +445,6 @@ static void do_tlbies(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long 
> *rbvalues,
>        * the RS field, this is backwards-compatible with P7 and P8.
>        */
>       if (global) {
> -             while (!try_lock_tlbie(&kvm->arch.tlbie_lock))
> -                     cpu_relax();
>               if (need_sync)
>                       asm volatile("ptesync" : : : "memory");
>               for (i = 0; i < npages; ++i) {
> @@ -483,7 +463,6 @@ static void do_tlbies(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long 
> *rbvalues,
>               }
>  
>               asm volatile("eieio; tlbsync; ptesync" : : : "memory");
> -             kvm->arch.tlbie_lock = 0;
>       } else {
>               if (need_sync)
>                       asm volatile("ptesync" : : : "memory");

Seems reasonable; is that a patch submission? :)

Paul.

Reply via email to