So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: > In light of the recently discovered bug with NOP handling, this adds > some more testcases for NOP handling. Specifically, it adds a helper > program which will add a NOP tag after every existing tag in a dtb, > and runs the standard battery of tests over trees mangled in this way. > > For now, this does not add a NOP at the very beginning of the > structure block. This causes problems for libfdt at present, because > we assume in many places that the root node's BEGIN_NODE tag is at > offset 0. I'm still contemplating what to do about this (with one > option being simply to declare such dtbs invalid). > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied. BTW, declaring DTBs with BEGIN_NODES not at offset 0 as invalid seems like a fine choice to me. jdl _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
