On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 14:21 +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 17/04/18 12:09, Alastair D'Silva wrote: > > From: Alastair D'Silva <alast...@d-silva.org> > > > > Switch the use of TIDR on it's CPU feature, rather than assuming it > > is available based on architecture. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alast...@d-silva.org> > > There's a use of TIDR in restore_sprs() that's behind the ARCH_300 > flag > as well, ideally it should never trigger in the !P9_TIDR case, but > you > might want to update that too for clarity? >
Thanks for the review, I'll include your suggestions in the next set. -- Alastair D'Silva Open Source Developer Linux Technology Centre, IBM Australia mob: 0423 762 819
