On Thursday, February 14, 2008 1:40 am Martin Mares wrote: > Hi Greg! > > > I have no idea, it sounds like a PPC specific thing, not anything the > > PCI core does, right? So I'll add the ppc list to the cc: and ask if > > anyone there has any ideas? > > Unfortunately, this is not PPC specific at all -- proc_attach_device() > calls pci_proc_domain(bus), which is an arch-specific hook turning on > the weird behavior I described. This hook can return non-zero even on > x86 if there are buses outside domain 0. > > I think that the hook itself is correct, it only should trigger more > consistent behavior of the generic code :) > > Would it be acceptable for the PPC folks to modify the code to add > domain numbers to the device numbers in /proc/bus/pci/devices in the > same format as the bus directories already have? > > If so, I will cook up a patch.
I've run into this too, on machines with many domains. It's unfortunate that there's no way to preserve compatibility, but I agree that the brokenness may as well be consistent. Jesse _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
