On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:41:07PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote: > David Gibson wrote: > > Err.. now I'm doubly confused. Initially I thought you'd need to > > change the size part of reg somewhere, but your description above just > > convinced me you didn't (because you were essentially just shifting a > > 4M map up into the high rather than low 4M of the 64M space). Now > > you're saying you do.. > > > If you tell the mtd driver that the flash is 64M, when it is really 4M, > it goes oops. So you do have to get the size right in the reg field.
It'd be nice if we could pass in a flag to tell it not to try to find additional consecutive chips in the mapping... It's a shame to have probable chips, and still have to know how big they are anyway. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
