On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:13:11 -0300 Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 03/13/2018 02:59 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote: > > Maybe it would make more sense to move the messages to the function > > that actually patches in the instructions? > > That helps, but if the instructions are not patched (e.g., > no_rfi_flush) then there is no information about what the system > actually supports, which is useful for diagnostics/debugging (and > patch verification! :-) ) Can't you patch with debugfs in that case? Thanks Michal
