On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 14:43:40 +0100 Christophe LEROY <christophe.le...@c-s.fr> wrote:
> Le 06/03/2018 à 14:25, Nicholas Piggin a écrit : > > @@ -147,7 +149,8 @@ static void slice_mask_for_free(struct mm_struct *mm, > > struct slice_mask *ret, > > __set_bit(i, ret->high_slices); > > } > > > > -static void slice_mask_for_size(struct mm_struct *mm, int psize, struct > > slice_mask *ret, > > +static void slice_mask_for_size(struct mm_struct *mm, int psize, > > + struct slice_mask *ret, > > That seems to be cleanup only, is it worth including that in this patch ? Yeah that can go. Thanks, Nick
