Hi Dan Carpenter,

On Wednesday 31 January 2018 08:55 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Hello Anju T Sudhakar,

The patch 885dcd709ba9: "powerpc/perf: Add nest IMC PMU support" from
Jul 19, 2017, leads to the following static checker warning:

        arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c:1393 init_imc_pmu()
        warn: 'pmu_ptr' was already freed.

arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
   1317  int init_imc_pmu(struct device_node *parent, struct imc_pmu *pmu_ptr, 
int pmu_idx)
   1318  {
   1319          int ret;
   1320
   1321          ret = imc_mem_init(pmu_ptr, parent, pmu_idx);
   1322          if (ret) {
   1323                  imc_common_mem_free(pmu_ptr);
   1324                  return ret;
   1325          }

Change this to:

                if (ret)
                        goto err_free_mpu_ptr;

Or something instead of a direct return.  That's more normal kernel
style.

   1326
   1327          switch (pmu_ptr->domain) {
   1328          case IMC_DOMAIN_NEST:
   1329                  /*
   1330                  * Nest imc pmu need only one cpu per chip, we 
initialize the
   1331                  * cpumask for the first nest imc pmu and use the same 
for the
   1332                  * rest. To handle the cpuhotplug callback unregister, 
we track
   1333                  * the number of nest pmus in "nest_pmus".
   1334                  */
   1335                  mutex_lock(&nest_init_lock);
   1336                  if (nest_pmus == 0) {
   1337                          ret = init_nest_pmu_ref();
   1338                          if (ret) {
   1339                                  mutex_unlock(&nest_init_lock);
   1340                                  goto err_free;
   1341                          }
   1342                          /* Register for cpu hotplug notification. */
   1343                          ret = nest_pmu_cpumask_init();
   1344                          if (ret) {
   1345                                  mutex_unlock(&nest_init_lock);
   1346                                  kfree(nest_imc_refc);
   1347                                  kfree(per_nest_pmu_arr);
   1348                                  goto err_free;
   1349                          }
   1350                  }
   1351                  nest_pmus++;
   1352                  mutex_unlock(&nest_init_lock);
   1353                  break;
   1354          case IMC_DOMAIN_CORE:
   1355                  ret = core_imc_pmu_cpumask_init();
   1356                  if (ret) {
   1357                          cleanup_all_core_imc_memory();
   1358                          return ret;

These direct returns don't look correct...

   1359                  }
   1360
   1361                  break;
   1362          case IMC_DOMAIN_THREAD:
   1363                  ret = thread_imc_cpu_init();
   1364                  if (ret) {
   1365                          cleanup_all_thread_imc_memory();
   1366                          return ret;
   1367                  }
   1368
   1369                  break;
   1370          default:
   1371                  return  -1;     /* Unknown domain */

This one certainly looks like a memory leak.  Plus -1 is -EPERM which is
probably not the correct error code.


   1372          }
   1373
   1374          ret = update_events_in_group(parent, pmu_ptr);
   1375          if (ret)
   1376                  goto err_free;
   1377
   1378          ret = update_pmu_ops(pmu_ptr);
   1379          if (ret)
   1380                  goto err_free;
   1381
   1382          ret = perf_pmu_register(&pmu_ptr->pmu, pmu_ptr->pmu.name, -1);
   1383          if (ret)
   1384                  goto err_free;
   1385
   1386          pr_info("%s performance monitor hardware support registered\n",
   1387                                                          
pmu_ptr->pmu.name);
   1388
   1389          return 0;
   1390
   1391  err_free:
   1392          imc_common_mem_free(pmu_ptr);
   1393          imc_common_cpuhp_mem_free(pmu_ptr);
                                           ^^^^^^^
This is a use after free, it should be in the reverse order.

err_free_cpuhp:
        imc_common_cpuhp_mem_free(pmu_ptr);
err_free_pmu_ptr:
        imc_common_mem_free(pmu_ptr);

   1394          return ret;
   1395  }

regards,
dan carpenter



Apologies for the delayed response, I just got back from vacation.

Thank you for pointing out this, I will rework the code and send.


Regards,
Anju

Reply via email to