Grant Likely wrote: > -ifneq ($(CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE),"") > -image-$(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) += cuImage.8xx > -image-$(CONFIG_PPC_EP88XC) += zImage.ep88xc > -image-$(CONFIG_EP405) += zImage.ep405 > -image-$(CONFIG_8260) += cuImage.pq2 > -image-$(CONFIG_EP8248E) += zImage.ep8248e > -image-$(CONFIG_PPC_MPC52xx) += cuImage.52xx > -image-$(CONFIG_STORCENTER) += cuImage.824x > -image-$(CONFIG_PPC_83xx) += cuImage.83xx > -image-$(CONFIG_PPC_85xx) += cuImage.85xx > -ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPM2),y) > -image-$(CONFIG_PPC_85xx) += cuImage.85xx-cpm2 > -endif > -image-$(CONFIG_MPC7448HPC2) += cuImage.hpc2 > +# > +# Targets which embed a device tree blob > +# > +# Theses are default targets to build images which embed device tree blobs. > +# They are only required on boards which do not have FDT support in firmware. > +# Boards with newish u-boot firmare can use the uImage target above > +# > + > +# Board ports in arch/powerpc/platform/40x/Kconfig > +image-$(CONFIG_EP405) += zImage-dtb.ep405 > +image-$(CONFIG_WALNUT) += treeImage.walnut > + > +# Board ports in arch/powerpc/platform/44x/Kconfig > image-$(CONFIG_EBONY) += treeImage.ebony cuImage.ebony > image-$(CONFIG_BAMBOO) += treeImage.bamboo > cuImage.bamboo > image-$(CONFIG_SEQUOIA) += cuImage.sequoia > image-$(CONFIG_RAINIER) += cuImage.rainier > -image-$(CONFIG_WALNUT) += treeImage.walnut > image-$(CONFIG_TAISHAN) += cuImage.taishan > image-$(CONFIG_KATMAI) += cuImage.katmai > image-$(CONFIG_WARP) += cuImage.warp > -endif > > -ifneq ($(CONFIG_REDBOOT),"") > -image-$(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) += zImage.redboot-8xx > -endif > +# Board ports in arch/powerpc/platform/8xx/Kconfig > +image-$(CONFIG_PPC_MPC86XADS) += cuImage.mpc866ads > +image-$(CONFIG_PPC_MPC885ADS) += zImage-dtb.mpc885ads
mpc885ads is cuImage. > +# Board ports in arch/powerpc/platform/83xx/Kconfig > +image-$(CONFIG_MPC8313_RDB) += cuImage.mpc8313erdb I don't think we need cuImage for this board (no pre-device-tree u-boot). > +image-$(CONFIG_MPC837x_MDS) += cuImage.mpc8377_mds \ > + cuImage.mpc8378_mds \ > + cuImage.mpc8379_mds I really hope we don't need cuImage for these. :-) I wish CONFIG_BOARD_FOO could be annotated with properties such as image name and bootwrapper platform, rather than having to maintain separate lists... Oh well. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
