On 25 December 2017 at 21:05, Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> Hi Ard.
>
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 08:54:33PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Before updating certain subsystems to use place relative 32-bit
>> relocations in special sections, to save space  and reduce the
>> number of absolute relocations that need to be processed at runtime
>> by relocatable kernels, introduce the Kconfig symbol and define it
>> for some architectures that should be able to support and benefit
>> from it.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidef...@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <h...@zytor.com>
>> Cc: x...@kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/Kconfig                    | 10 ++++++++++
>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig              |  1 +
>
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S |  2 +-
> The change to arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S is
> not justified in the changelog.
> Did you add it by mistake?
>

No. The PREL32 support adds a __ADDRESSABLE() macro that emits code
into .discard.text, and on arm64, the EFI object sections get a .init
prefix so we need to discard .init.discard.* explicitly as well.

I will add this as a note.

Thanks,
Ard.

Reply via email to