On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 09:32 -0600, Bryant G. Ly wrote:
> When pseries SR-IOV is enabled and after a PF driver
> has resumed from EEH, platform has to be notified
> of the event so the child VFs can be allowed to
> resume their normal recovery path.
> 
> This patch makes the EEH operation allow unfreeze
> platform dependent code and adds the call to
> pseries EEH code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bryant G. Ly <bryan...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Juan J. Alvarez <jjalv...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Just some nitpicks, there's a lot of weird whitespace in this patch

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h               |   1 +
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c             |   4 ++
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c |   3 +-
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 100
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> index 5161c37dd039..12d52a0cd447 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ struct eeh_ops {
>       int (*write_config)(struct pci_dn *pdn, int where, int size,
> u32 val);
>       int (*next_error)(struct eeh_pe **pe);
>       int (*restore_config)(struct pci_dn *pdn);
> +     int (*notify_resume)(struct pci_dn *pdn);
>  };
>  
>  extern int eeh_subsystem_flags;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> index c61bf770282b..dbda0cda559b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> @@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ static void *eeh_report_resume(void *data, void
> *userdata)
>       bool was_in_error;
>       struct pci_driver *driver;
>       char *envp[] = {"EVENT=EEH_RESUME", "ONLINE=1", NULL};
> +     struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
>  
>       if (!dev || eeh_dev_removed(edev) || eeh_pe_passed(edev-
> >pe))
>               return NULL;
> @@ -384,6 +385,9 @@ static void *eeh_report_resume(void *data, void
> *userdata)
>       driver->err_handler->resume(dev);
>       eeh_pcid_put(dev);
>       kobject_uevent_env(&dev->dev.kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, envp);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> +     eeh_ops->notify_resume(pdn);
> +#endif
>       return NULL;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> index 961e64115d92..8575b3a29e7c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> @@ -1763,7 +1763,8 @@ static struct eeh_ops pnv_eeh_ops = {
>       .read_config            = pnv_eeh_read_config,
>       .write_config           = pnv_eeh_write_config,
>       .next_error             = pnv_eeh_next_error,
> -     .restore_config         = pnv_eeh_restore_config
> +     .restore_config         = pnv_eeh_restore_config,
> +     .notify_resume          = NULL
>  };
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> index 5bdd1678a9ff..2b36fbf4ce74 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> @@ -798,6 +798,103 @@ static int pseries_eeh_restore_config(struct
> pci_dn *pdn)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> +int pseries_send_allow_unfreeze(struct eeh_pe *pe,
> +                             u16 *vf_pe_array, int cur_vfs)
> +{
> +     int  rc, config_addr;

extra space

> +     int ibm_allow_unfreeze = rtas_token("ibm,open-sriov-allow-
> unfreeze");
> +
> +     config_addr = pe->config_addr;
> +     spin_lock(&rtas_data_buf_lock);
> +     memcpy(rtas_data_buf, vf_pe_array, RTAS_DATA_BUF_SIZE);
> +     rc = rtas_call(ibm_allow_unfreeze, 5, 1, NULL,
> +                    config_addr,
> +                    BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> +                    BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid),
> +                    rtas_data_buf, cur_vfs * sizeof(u16));
> +     spin_unlock(&rtas_data_buf_lock);
> +     if (rc)
> +             pr_warn("%s: Failed to allow unfreeze for PHB#%x-
> PE#%x, rc=%x\n",
> +                     __func__,
> +                     pe->phb->global_number,
> +                     pe->config_addr, rc);
> +     return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int pseries_call_allow_unfreeze(struct eeh_dev *edev)
> +{
> +     struct eeh_pe *pe;
> +     struct pci_dn *pdn, *tmp, *parent, *physfn_pdn;
> +     int cur_vfs, rc, vf_index;
> +     u16 *vf_pe_array;
> +
> +     vf_pe_array = kzalloc(RTAS_DATA_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!vf_pe_array)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     memset(vf_pe_array, 0, RTAS_DATA_BUF_SIZE);
> +     cur_vfs = 0;
> +     rc = 0;
> +     if (edev->pdev->is_physfn) {
> +             pe = eeh_dev_to_pe(edev);
> +             cur_vfs = pci_num_vf(edev->pdev);
> +             pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
> +             parent  = pdn->parent;

extra space

> +             /* For each of its VF
> +              * call allow unfreeze
> +              */

Weird line split here, and the comment doesn't read very well, and
doesn't describe anything that isn't easily figured out by looking at
the code.

> +             for (vf_index = 0; vf_index < cur_vfs; vf_index++)
> +                     vf_pe_array[vf_index] =
> +                             be16_to_cpu(pdn-
> >pe_num_map[vf_index]);
> +
> +             rc = pseries_send_allow_unfreeze(pe, vf_pe_array,
> cur_vfs);
> +             pdn->last_allow_rc = rc;
> +             for (vf_index = 0; vf_index < cur_vfs; vf_index++) {
> +                     list_for_each_entry_safe(pdn, tmp, &parent-
> >child_list,
> +                                              list) {
> +                             if (pdn->busno
> +                                 != pci_iov_virtfn_bus(edev-
> >pdev,
> +                                                       vf_index)
> ||
> +                                 pdn->devfn
> +                                 != pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(edev-
> >pdev,
> +                                                         vf_index
> ))

I know you're running out of room here but it looks really gross. 
Could this possibly be refactored?

> +                                     continue;
> +                             pdn->last_allow_rc = rc;
> +                     }
> +             }
> +     } else {
> +             pdn = pci_get_pdn(edev->pdev);
> +             vf_pe_array[0] = be16_to_cpu(pdn->pe_number);
> +             physfn_pdn      =  pci_get_pdn(edev->physfn);

more extra space

> +             edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(physfn_pdn);
> +             pe = eeh_dev_to_pe(edev);
> +             rc = pseries_send_allow_unfreeze(pe, vf_pe_array,
> 1);
> +             pdn->last_allow_rc = rc;
> +     }
> +
> +     kfree(vf_pe_array);
> +     return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int pseries_notify_resume(struct pci_dn *pdn)
> +{
> +     struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
> +
> +     if (!edev)
> +             return -EEXIST;
> +
> +     if (rtas_token("ibm,open-sriov-allow-unfreeze")
> +         == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     if (edev->pdev->is_physfn  || edev->pdev->is_virtfn)

extra space

> +             return pseries_call_allow_unfreeze(edev);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static struct eeh_ops pseries_eeh_ops = {
>       .name                   = "pseries",
>       .init                   = pseries_eeh_init,
> @@ -813,7 +910,8 @@ static struct eeh_ops pseries_eeh_ops = {
>       .read_config            = pseries_eeh_read_config,
>       .write_config           = pseries_eeh_write_config,
>       .next_error             = NULL,
> -     .restore_config         = pseries_eeh_restore_config
> +     .restore_config         = pseries_eeh_restore_config,
> +     .notify_resume          = pseries_notify_resume
>  };
>  
>  /**

Reply via email to