On Fri, 03 Nov 2017 12:13:19 +1100 Michael Neuling <mi...@neuling.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 12:55 +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > DD2.1 does not have to flush the ERAT after a state-loss idle. It also > > does not have to save and restore MMCR0 (although it does have to save > > restore in deep idle states, like other PMU registers). > > Minor nit, can we do this as two separate commits in case we discover one is > broken. Good idea, resent. Thanks, Nick
