On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 22:07:39 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Per Documentation/kprobes.txt, we don't necessarily need to disable
> interrupts before invoking the kprobe handlers. Masami submitted
> similar changes for x86 via commit a19b2e3d783964 ("kprobes/x86: Remove
> IRQ disabling from ftrace-based/optimized kprobes"). Do the same for
> powerpc.

Yes, and this requires to make preempt disable :)

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>

Thank you!

> 
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c | 10 ++--------
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c      | 10 ----------
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
> index 4b1f34f685b1..7a1f99f1b47f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
> @@ -75,11 +75,7 @@ void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long nip, unsigned 
> long parent_nip,
>  {
>       struct kprobe *p;
>       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
> -     unsigned long flags;
>  
> -     /* Disable irq for emulating a breakpoint and avoiding preempt */
> -     local_irq_save(flags);
> -     hard_irq_disable();
>       preempt_disable();
>  
>       p = get_kprobe((kprobe_opcode_t *)nip);
> @@ -105,16 +101,14 @@ void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long nip, unsigned 
> long parent_nip,
>               else {
>                       /*
>                        * If pre_handler returns !0, it sets regs->nip and
> -                      * resets current kprobe. In this case, we still need
> -                      * to restore irq, but not preemption.
> +                      * resets current kprobe. In this case, we should not
> +                      * re-enable preemption.
>                        */
> -                     local_irq_restore(flags);
>                       return;
>               }
>       }
>  end:
>       preempt_enable_no_resched();
> -     local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_ftrace_handler);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
> index 60ba7f1370a8..8237884ca389 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
> @@ -115,14 +115,10 @@ static unsigned long can_optimize(struct kprobe *p)
>  static void optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
>                              struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -     unsigned long flags;
> -
>       /* This is possible if op is under delayed unoptimizing */
>       if (kprobe_disabled(&op->kp))
>               return;
>  
> -     local_irq_save(flags);
> -     hard_irq_disable();
>       preempt_disable();
>  
>       if (kprobe_running()) {
> @@ -135,13 +131,7 @@ static void optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe 
> *op,
>               __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
>       }
>  
> -     /*
> -      * No need for an explicit __hard_irq_enable() here.
> -      * local_irq_restore() will re-enable interrupts,
> -      * if they were hard disabled.
> -      */
>       preempt_enable_no_resched();
> -     local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(optimized_callback);
>  
> -- 
> 2.14.2
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to