On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 13:00 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > Ugly grep follows: > > > > $ grep -rohP --include=*.[ch] "\w+\s*=\s*[kv].alloc\s*\(\s*sizeof.*," * | \ > > sed -r -e 's/(\w+)\s*=\s*[kv].alloc\s*\(\s*sizeof\s*\(\s*\*\s*\1\s*\)/foo > > = k.alloc(sizeof(*foo))/' \ > > -e > > 's/(\w+)\s*=\s*[kv].alloc\s*\(\s*sizeof\s*\(\s*struct\s+\w+\s*\)/foo = > > k.alloc(sizeof(struct foo))/' | \ > > sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -2 > > 6123 foo = k.alloc(sizeof(*foo)), > > 3060 foo = k.alloc(sizeof(struct foo)), > > Would you like to get this ratio changed in any ways?
No. > Available development tools could help to improve the software situation > in a desired direction, couldn't they? > > > Unpleasant consequences are possible in both cases. > How much do you care to reduce the failure probability further? Zero. The alloc style is trivially useful for new code. Existing code doesn't need change.
