On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 02:13 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:15 -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:14:03AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> > > For example a machine with 4GB of memory would end up with the normal
> > > IOMMU window from 0-2GB and the fixed mapping window from 2GB to 6GB. In
> > > this case a 64-bit device wishing to DMA to 1GB would be told to DMA to
> > > 3GB, plus any offset required by firmware. The firmware offset is encoded
> > > in the "dma-ranges" property.
> >
> > Shouldn't the fixed mapping be between 4G and 8G (and the offset for 1G
> > is at 5G), to account for the MMIO range at 2-4G?
>
> I don't think so, ie. it works setup like that, but I'm not entirely
> sure why. Presumably the 2-4GB for MMIO is only for cycles heading out
> of the CPU.
No no no... it's because on the PCI segment, it's all offset up
remember ?
Basically, the PCI host bridge on these has 2 interesting windows for
us:
0....2G -> This goes up to memory @0 (via a couple of
layers)
0x80*....0xF* -> This goes untranslated to the PLB5 which
drops the top bits and does some other
manipulations, which allows to access, among
others the full 32GB of the cell inbound
range.
The MMIO region of 2...4G is on the PCI (outbound from the Cell is yet
another range of addresses with different constraints but that ends up
generating cycles between 2 and 4G on the PCI segment).
If we had set the direct mapped region so that it uses 2G...N on PCI, we
would indeed be toast. But instead, the addresses for direct DMA that we
hand out to devices are in the 0x80* region and go hit the cell
directly, they never match MMIO.
Ben.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
