On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 02:38:51PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote: > > /* > > * well... answering your question - it seems raw versions of seqcount > > * functions don't call lockdep's lock_acquire/lock_release... > > * > > * but I have never told you that. never. > > */ > > Hum... I'm not sure that would be the best way since in other case lockdep > checks are valid, but if getting rid of locked's warning is required to get > this series upstream, I'd use raw versions... Please advice...
No sensible other way to shut it up come to mind though. Might be best to use the raw primitives with a comment explaining why.
