On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:50:03AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> devm_kasprintf() can fail here and we must check its return value.

This is patch 2/3 but you've only sent me this one patch.  This is
missing the point of numbering a series, the only reason for the
numbering is to provide ordering within the series.  If you send a patch
separately or as part of a different series then the numbering should
change to reflect how things are being sent.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to