General comment:  if you're going to index arrays by enum
values, it's best to initialize them that way too.  Else
you're expecting a particular optional policy for how the
enums get grown...

- Dave


On Monday 21 January 2008, Jean Delvare wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc8.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c    2008-01-20 
> 17:26:58.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc8/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c 2008-01-20 19:03:48.000000000 
> +0100
> @@ -102,42 +102,36 @@ struct chip_desc {
>       char                    name[9];
>       unsigned                nvram56:1;
>       unsigned                alarm:1;
> -     enum ds_type            type;
>  };
>  
>  static const struct chip_desc chips[] = { {
>       .name           = "ds1307",
> -     .type           = ds_1307,
>       .nvram56        = 1,
>  }, {

So tables like this would become

        [ds1307] = { ... },
        [ds1337] = { ... },

>       .name           = "ds1337",
> -     .type           = ds_1337,
>       .alarm          = 1,
>  }, {
>       .name           = "ds1338",
> -     .type           = ds_1338,
>       .nvram56        = 1,
>  }, {
>       .name           = "ds1339",
> -     .type           = ds_1339,
>       .alarm          = 1,
>  }, {
>       .name           = "ds1340",
> -     .type           = ds_1340,
>  }, {
>       .name           = "m41t00",
> -     .type           = m41t00,
>  }, };
>  
> -static inline const struct chip_desc *find_chip(const char *s)
> -{
> -     unsigned i;
> -
> -     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(chips); i++)
> -             if (strnicmp(s, chips[i].name, sizeof chips[i].name) == 0)
> -                     return &chips[i];
> -     return NULL;
> -}
> +static const struct i2c_device_id ds1307_id[] = {
> +     { "ds1307", ds_1307 },
> +     { "ds1337", ds_1337 },
> +     { "ds1338", ds_1338 },
> +     { "ds1339", ds_1339 },
> +     { "ds1340", ds_1340 },
> +     { "m41t00", m41t00 },
> +     {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ds1307_id);
>  
>  static int ds1307_get_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *t)
>  {
> @@ -335,12 +329,7 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
>       const struct chip_desc  *chip;
>       struct i2c_adapter      *adapter = to_i2c_adapter(client->dev.parent);
>  
> -     chip = find_chip(client->name);
> -     if (!chip) {
> -             dev_err(&client->dev, "unknown chip type '%s'\n",
> -                             client->name);
> -             return -ENODEV;
> -     }
> +     chip = &chips[id->driver_data];

... and that would *ensure* such lines always work right,
no matter how the enum values grow.

>  
>       if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter,
>                       I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_BYTE_DATA))
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to