On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:15:28 +0100 (CET) Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew, > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:44:40 +0100 (CET) Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:06:23 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL > > > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hare are the ps3av/fb patches for 2.6.25: > > > > > > > > I would have to say: it's a bit late to be submitting things of this > > > > nature > > > > for 2.6.25. Given the mess everyone has made of everything there's > > > > little > > > > chance that I'll be able to do a 2.6.24-mm1 so this stuff basically goes > > > > into mainline without public testing. > > > > > > I beg to disagree (of course :-) > > > > > > I posted these patches before, about 2 months ago. Unfortunately I didn't > > > CC > > > you at that time, so they slipped under your radar. > > > But the patches did receive public testing even before that, when they > > > entered > > > Geoff's ps3-linux.git tree. > > > > Should that git tree be in the -mm lineup? > > That may be a good idea! Geoff? There are lots of powerpc sub-trees. Kumar's, Geoff's, mine, Olof's, Grant's, Vitaly's are just the ones I can think of the top of my head. Shouldn't we just ask Paul to sync up more often rather than have Andrew track X number of trees that eventually all merge into Paul's anyway? josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
