On 08/18/2017 03:35 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> Add support for the new speculative faults event.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <lduf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c               | 1 +
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.c        | 4 ++++
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.l        | 1 +
>  tools/perf/util/python.c              | 1 +
>  5 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h 
> b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index b1c0b187acfe..3043ec0988e9 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ enum perf_sw_ids {
>       PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS          = 8,
>       PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY                     = 9,
>       PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT                = 10,
> +     PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF_DONE                  = 11,

Right, just one event for the success case. 'DONE' is redundant, only
'SPF' should be fine IMHO.

Reply via email to