On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:17:19PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >Freescale soc register space: "fsl,soc"
> >generic soc device: "soc" (or maybe "linux,soc" better?)
> >
> >I know, Scott Wood is pushing "xxxx-immr" thing forward... but
> >I don't like that name because SOC isn't only device with the
> >Internal Memory Mapped Registers.
>
> If you look in the manual for xxxx, you'll find something called
> "Internal Memory Mapped Registers". Thus, the name xxxx-immr.
Theory.
> >(Think of QE placed outside of "soc"/"immr" node).
>
> When is the QE ever placed outside the soc/immr/ccsr node?
> The QE registers are part of the IMMR/CCSR.
Practice.
$ grep qe@ arch/powerpc/boot/dts/*
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc832x_mds.dts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc832x_rdb.dts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc836x_mds.dts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
^^^ if the practice is wrong, then we should fix it, and then
-immr would be the good name indeed (just as I've said previously).
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
backup email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
