On 07/24/2017 09:47 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Tyrel Datwyler <turtle.in.the.ker...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 07/24/2017 03:42 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> As for commit 68baf692c435 ("powerpc/pseries: Fix of_node_put()
>>>> underflow during DLPAR remove"), the call to of_node_put()
>>>> must be removed from pSeries_reconfig_remove_node().
>>>>
>>>> dlpar_detach_node() and pSeries_reconfig_remove_node() call
>>>> of_detach_node(), and thus the node should not be released
>>>> in this case too.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c | 1 -
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> Thanks. I'll spare you the swearing about why we have the same bug in
>>> two places.
>>
>> That's probably my bad. I must have failed to test with older powerpc-util
>> tooling where
>> drmgr uses the /proc/ofdt interface for device tree modification.
>
> OK. Really we should have automated tests of the various cases, I've
> just never had time to write any.
Agreed, some better CI is warranted.
>
> Mainly the thing that bugs me is that we still have the two separate
> paths. Or if we must maintain both they could at least share more code,
> the two functions do basically the same thing AFAICS.
Yeah, I think that is where I dropped the ball. I wrongly assumed by not
looking close
enough that code was shared in those two paths. Definitely some code
de-duplication work
that can be done.
-Tyrel
>
> cheers
>
