Ben, do you approve of this? How should error be checked for, is
<NO_IRQ right? The current code in the kernel looks to be broken
because of these checks, the ppc build is wrong and powerpc polled
mode doesn't work.
On 1/21/08, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alter the mpc i2c driver to use the NO_IRQ symbol instead of the constant
> zero when checking for valid interrupts. NO_IRQ=-1 on ppc and NO_IRQ=0 on
> powerpc so the checks against zero are not correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> index bbe787b..d20959d 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int i2c_wait(struct mpc_i2c *i2c, unsigned timeout,
> int writing)
> u32 x;
> int result = 0;
>
> - if (i2c->irq == 0)
> + if (i2c->irq == NO_IRQ)
> {
> while (!(readb(i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR) & CSR_MIF)) {
> schedule();
> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> i2c->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (i2c->irq < 0) {
> + if (i2c->irq < NO_IRQ) {
> result = -ENXIO;
> goto fail_get_irq;
> }
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto fail_map;
> }
>
> - if (i2c->irq != 0)
> + if (i2c->irq != NO_IRQ)
> if ((result = request_irq(i2c->irq, mpc_i2c_isr,
> IRQF_SHARED, "i2c-mpc", i2c)) < 0) {
> printk(KERN_ERR
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return result;
>
> fail_add:
> - if (i2c->irq != 0)
> + if (i2c->irq != NO_IRQ)
> free_irq(i2c->irq, i2c);
> fail_irq:
> iounmap(i2c->base);
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> i2c_del_adapter(&i2c->adap);
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>
> - if (i2c->irq != 0)
> + if (i2c->irq != NO_IRQ)
> free_irq(i2c->irq, i2c);
>
> iounmap(i2c->base);
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> i2c mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
>
--
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
