On 13/07/17 13:25, Matt Brown wrote:
@@ -1049,6 +1066,13 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, struct pt_regs *regs, do_cmp_unsigned(regs, val, val2, rd >> 2); goto instr_done;+ case 19173952: /* cmpb */
This looks wrong and should never trigger, given that the switch statement is comparing against ((instr >> 1) & 0x3ff).
How did you get this value? -- Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
