Em Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:40:08AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu escreveu: > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [a...@kernel.org] wrote: > > Em Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:09:12PM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu: > > > So for starters you should probably drop that one and add 0x004e1200 and > > > 0x004e0200. > Yes, thanks. > > Could this check be somehow done automatically? Using whatever is in the > > kernel sources or some IBM released document? > Yes, had a recent discussion offline with Michael Petlan and Jiri about > generalizing/simplifying this. For now, I have added the above PVRs and > will look into the broader fix. > The following changes since commit 07d306c838c5c30196619baae36107d0615e459b: > Merge git://www.linux-watchdog.org/linux-watchdog (2017-07-11 09:59:37 > -0700) > are available in the git repository at: > https://github.com/sukadev/linux/ p9-json
Can you please base your branches out ouf tip/perf/core or acme/perf/core when you submit it with the fixes discussed here? thanks, - Arnaldo
