Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> writes: > On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 13:51 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> writes: >> >> > On radix, the process table entry we want to clear when >> > destroying a context is entry 0, not entry 1 >> >> .. but has no real world consequence? Or causes the system to instantly >> catch fire? > > It has no *immediate* consequence on P9 , but it can cause other bugs > to become worse (such as the KVM issue I'm chasing).
OK, I'll flag it for stable then to be safe. cheers
