On 1/23/08, Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, like, the other day Jon Smirl mumbled: > > Convert MPC i2c driver from a platform_driver to a > > of_platform_driver. Add the ability to dynamically load i2c drivers > > based on device tree names. Routine names were changed from fsl_ to > > mpc_ to make them match the file name. Common code moved to > > powerpc-common.* Orginal ppc driver left intact for deletion when ppc > > arch is removed. > > This seems backwards to me. I was under the impression > that our trend was _toward_ "Freescale" and "fsl" names...? > And aren't the drivers also already using "fsl-i2c" in the > DTS files as called out in the b-w-o.txt too?
The routine names should match the file name which then determines the module name. I didn't want to change the module name so I made the routines names match the module name. > > Grumble long lines not hard-limited to 70-ish columns, > yes, even in log messages... :-) > > jdl > -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
