On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote: > Rather it should be 2. I'll admit the physical setup of this machine is > .... less than ideal but clearly it's something that can happen even if > it's a bad idea.
Ok. Lets hope that Pekka's find does the trick. But this would mean that fallback gets memory from node 2 for the page allocator. Then fallback alloc is going to try to insert it into the l3 of node 2 which is not there yet. So another ooops. Sigh. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
