On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:15:07 -0600 Joshua Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:08:38 -0600 > > Joshua Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 16:43 -0600, Joshua Williams wrote: > >>>> Various new ibm405 DCRN #defines. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Joshua Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> May I ask what for ? :-) Also, it's all arch/ppc, not arch/powerpc... > >>> nothing we want to improve to much on at this stage unless there's a > >>> really good reason. > >> The 405x #defines were incomplete and this was meant to > >> make them a bit tighter. Since arch/ppc is in life support > >> mode this can wait until the 405x stuff gets moved over to > >> arch/powerpc. > > > > Which 405x stuff? Walnut is moved over already. Other boards will > > need to be ported by people that have those boards. > > Gotcha. I'll revisit this once everything has been moved over. Sorry, maybe Ben and I aren't being clear. 405GP (Walnut) support is in arch/powerpc. There is also support for 405EX and 405EXr. The arch/ppc tree is going to die in June, whether the rest of the 405 boards are ported or not. So are you trying to add defines for a new board, or? I don't see much of a reason not to go ahead and do what you're doing now rather than later but I'll leave that up to you :) josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
