Hi,

On Wed, 10 May 2017 14:09:53 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> 
wrote:
>
> > +static void nest_change_cpu_context(int old_cpu, int new_cpu)
> > +{
> > +   int i;
> > +
> > +   for (i = 0;
> > +        (per_nest_pmu_arr[i] != NULL) && (i < IMC_MAX_PMUS); i++)
> > +           perf_pmu_migrate_context(&per_nest_pmu_arr[i]->pmu,
> > +                                                   old_cpu, new_cpu);  
> 
> Bah, this is horrible to read.
> 
>       struct imc_pmu **pn = per_nest_pmu_arr;
>       int i;
> 
>       for (i = 0; *pn && i < IMC_MAX_PMUS; i++, pn++)
>               perf_pmu_migrate_context(&(*pn)->pmu, old_cpu, new_cpu);

(Just a bit of bike shedding ...)

Or even (since "i" is not used any more):

        struct imc_pmu **pn;

        for (pn = per_nest_pmu_arr;
             pn < &per_nest_pmu_arr[IMC_MAX_PMUS] && *pn;
             pn++)
                perf_pmu_migrate_context(&(*pn)->pmu, old_cpu, new_cpu);

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Reply via email to