Anshuman Khandual <khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > On 04/15/2017 01:48 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:11:12 +0530 >> Anshuman Khandual <khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> >>> This verifies virtual address mapping below and above the >>> 128TB range and makes sure that address returned are within >>> the expected range depending upon the hint passed from the >>> user space. >> >> This description does not mention anything PPC specific. Can this be >> generalized to work with Intel L5 enabled kernel as well? > > Hmm, I am not completely aware about the proposed mmap interface > for 128TB and beyond till 512TB by Kirill on x86. If both powerpc > and x86 will have the same semantics, then this test is generic > enough to cover both the architectures and will move it into > selftests/vm/ instead of current selftests/powerpc/mm.
I think it can be made generic, maybe it needs a few #ifdefs, but that's fine for a selftest. So yeah if you can move it to selftests/vm I think that would be better. cheers
