Do the checks that __flush_tlb_pending() does and check if
a local flush will do when batch->active is false inside of
hpte_need_flush(). I've checked the changes with tlbie tracing,
I see local flushes as applicable now and I've also run
some basic ltp testcases on top of these changes on a powernv
machine.

Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <bsinghar...@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_hash64.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_hash64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_hash64.c
index 4517aa4..1268e3a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_hash64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_hash64.c
@@ -93,12 +93,17 @@ void hpte_need_flush(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long 
addr,
 
        /*
         * Check if we have an active batch on this CPU. If not, just
-        * flush now and return. For now, we don global invalidates
-        * in that case, might be worth testing the mm cpu mask though
-        * and decide to use local invalidates instead...
+        * flush now and return.
         */
        if (!batch->active) {
-               flush_hash_page(vpn, rpte, psize, ssize, 0);
+               const struct cpumask *tmp;
+               int local = 0;
+
+               tmp = cpumask_of(smp_processor_id());
+               if (cpumask_equal(mm_cpumask(mm), tmp))
+                       local = 1;
+
+               flush_hash_page(vpn, rpte, psize, ssize, local);
                put_cpu_var(ppc64_tlb_batch);
                return;
        }
-- 
2.9.3

Reply via email to