"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > I also tested zram today with the command shared by Wilcox: > > without patch: 1.493782568 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.08% ) > with patch: 1.408457577 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.15% ) > > ... which also shows an improvement along the same lines as x86, as > reported by Minchan Kim.
I got: 1.344847397 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.13% ) Using the C versions. Can you also benchmark those on your setup so we can compare? So basically apply Matt's series but not your 2. cheers
