Harshal Patil <harshal.pa...@in.ibm.com> writes: > Hello, > I am looking into a bug, https://bugzilla.linux.ibm.com/show_bug.cgi?id=152493 > ( external mirror is at, https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/issues/1364) > Recently in runc code, they added this code > https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/eea28f480db435dbef4a275de9776b9934818b8c#diff-5f5c07d0cab3ce2086437d3d43c0d25fR155. > As you can see they set -onlcr to get rid of \r (line no. 164). Golang, in > which > runc is written, doesn't have any bindings for ioctls. This means you have to > invoke C code directly (that's what they are doing there). > Our guess is the ioctls in ppc64le differ than x86_64, and thats why the code > which is clearing onclr bit > (https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/eea28f480db435dbef4a275de9776b9934818b8c#diff-5f5c07d0cab3ce2086437d3d43c0d25fR164) > is failing on ppc64le but works fine on x86_64.
I think you've probably got enough replies, but the short answer is "yes", IOCTL numbers do differ across architectures - including potentially between 32-bit and 64-bit. cheers
