On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 03:37:17PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> We now get output like below which is much better.
> 
> [    0.935306]  good_mask low_slice: 0-15
> [    0.935360]  good_mask high_slice: 0-511
> 
> Compared to
> 
> [    0.953414]  good_mask:1111111111111111 - 1111111111111.........
> 
> I also fixed an error with slice_dbg printing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---

Yep, like this much better

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsinghar...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to