On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 03:37:17PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > We now get output like below which is much better. > > [ 0.935306] good_mask low_slice: 0-15 > [ 0.935360] good_mask high_slice: 0-511 > > Compared to > > [ 0.953414] good_mask:1111111111111111 - 1111111111111......... > > I also fixed an error with slice_dbg printing. > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > ---
Yep, like this much better Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsinghar...@gmail.com>
