On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:25:26PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:19:24PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 08:09:15AM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > >>> This patch adds the 405EXr to the powerpc cuptable. Basically the 405EXr > >>> is a 405EX with only one EMAC and only one PCIe interface. > >> Sounds like they have the same core... why do they need separate cputable > >> entries? > > > > AMCC has always indicated SoC products by new PVRs. This isn't news, > > even though it isn't exactly a clean solution. :) > > But the old 405EX entry would have matched both chips. Why add a new > significant bit to pvr_mask? For the name in /proc/cpuinfo?
Presumably, yes. Again, this is nothing new. Other 405/440 products are doing the same thing. -Olof _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
