PMC5 on POWER9 DD1 may not provide right counts in all
sampling scenarios, hence use PM_INST_DISP event instead
in PMC2 or PMC3 in preference.

Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 4 ++++
 arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h 
b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
index 3e9150f6690a..cf9bd8990159 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
@@ -222,6 +222,10 @@
        CNST_PMC_VAL(1) | CNST_PMC_VAL(2) | CNST_PMC_VAL(3) | \
        CNST_PMC_VAL(4) | CNST_PMC_VAL(5) | CNST_PMC_VAL(6) | CNST_NC_VAL
 
+/*
+ * Lets restrict use of PMC5 for instruction counting.
+ */
+#define P9_DD1_TEST_ADDER      (ISA207_TEST_ADDER | CNST_PMC_VAL(5))
 
 /* Bits in MMCR1 for PowerISA v2.07 */
 #define MMCR1_UNIT_SHIFT(pmc)          (60 - (4 * ((pmc) - 1)))
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
index a956bda9ecf4..ce00df370ce8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static struct power_pmu power9_isa207_pmu = {
        .name                   = "POWER9",
        .n_counter              = MAX_PMU_COUNTERS,
        .add_fields             = ISA207_ADD_FIELDS,
-       .test_adder             = ISA207_TEST_ADDER,
+       .test_adder             = P9_DD1_TEST_ADDER,
        .compute_mmcr           = isa207_compute_mmcr,
        .config_bhrb            = power9_config_bhrb,
        .bhrb_filter_map        = power9_bhrb_filter_map,
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to