Alexander Stein wrote:
Okay, I was just wondering why the timeout is dependant on the timer tick. That didn't seem obvious to me. Rethinking about this, I would rather replace those lines with msleep instead.
What's wrong with leaving it as-is? The code is five years old, and Freescale/NXP barely uses the QE any more. I don't have access to any hardware to test any changes you would propose.
