On 10/11/16 18:54, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Currently all the low-power idle states are expected to wake up > at reset vector 0x100. Which is why the macro IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ > that puts the CPU to an idle state and never returns. > > On ISA_300, when the ESL and EC bits in the PSSCR are zero, the > CPU is expected to wake up at the next instruction of the idle > instruction. > > This patch adds a new macro named IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ_NORET for the
I think something like IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ_LOSE_CTX would be better? > no-return variant and reuses the name IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ > for a variant that allows resuming operation at the instruction next > to the idle-instruction. > <snip> > + > +#define IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ_NORET(IDLE_INST) \ > + IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ(IDLE_INST) \ So we start off with both as the same? > b . > #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_P7_NAP */ <snip> Balbir
