So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: > > The doubly-linked list is intended to make it easier to construct search > > path lists one-at-a-time from arguments in the proper order, without > > needing to reverse the list at the end. > > We've already got that problem with a bunch of the lists we create > during parsing (we have several ugly add-to-end-of-singly-linked-list > functions). Going to doubly-linked lists might not be a bad idea, but > we should do it across the board, probably using the kernel's list.h > or something like it.
I would be happy to accept a kernel's-list.h-based refactoring for doubly linked lists after the imminent 1.1 release! jdl _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
