On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:54:12AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > > Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> writes: > > > >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> On 32-bit powerpc the ELF PLT sections of binaries (built with --bss-plt, > >>> or with a toolchain which defaults to it) look like this: > > ... > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> > >>> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com> > >>> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> > >>> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > >>> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> > >>> CC: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> > >>> CC: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >>> CC: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> > >>> CC: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> > >>> CC: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > >>> CC: Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> > >>> CC: linux...@kvack.org > >>> CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > >>> CC: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org > >>> Changes since v5: > >>> * made do_brk_flags() error out if any bits other than VM_EXEC are set. > >>> (Kees Cook: "With this, I'd be happy to Ack.") > >>> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/661595/ > >> > >> Excellent, thanks for the v6! Should this go via the ppc tree or the -mm > >> tree? > > > > -mm would be best, given the diffstat I think it's less likely to > > conflict if it goes via -mm. > > Okay, excellent. Andrew, do you have this already in email? I think > you weren't on the explicit CC from the v6...
FWIW (and ping), Tested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> On ARM32 (kirkwood) and PPC32 (405) For reference, here is the patchwork URL: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/677753/ Jason
