On Monday 05 September 2016 10:48 PM, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2016 07:11 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:07:27 +0530
Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
New Kconfig is added "CONFIG_IRQ_DEBUG_SUPPORT" to add a warn_on
to alert the usage of soft_irq_set_mask() for disabling lower
bitmask interrupts.
Have also moved the code under the CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS in
arch_local_irq_restore() to new Kconfig as suggested.
Patch also adds a new soft_irq_set_mask() to update paca->soft_enabled.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 4 ++++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 927d2ab2ce08..878f05925340 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ config TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
bool
default y
+config IRQ_DEBUG_SUPPORT
+ bool
+ default n
+
config LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
bool
default y
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
index 415734c07cfa..9f71559ce868 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
@@ -81,6 +81,23 @@ static inline unsigned long
arch_local_irq_disable(void)
return flags;
}
+static inline unsigned long soft_irq_set_mask(int value)
+{
+ unsigned long flags, zero;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DEBUG_SUPPORT
+ WARN_ON(value <= IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_LINUX);
+#endif
+ asm volatile(
+ "li %1,%3; lbz %0,%2(13); stb %1,%2(13)"
+ : "=r" (flags), "=&r" (zero)
+ : "i" (offsetof(struct paca_struct, soft_enabled)),\
+ "i" (value)
+ : "memory");
+
+ return flags;
+}
One other thing, if we have:
local_irq_save(flags); // disable LINUX mask -> LINUX
local_irq_and_pmu_save(flags); // disable PMU mask -> LINUX|PMU
local_irq_and_pmu_restore(flags); // enable PMU mask -> LINUX
local_irq_restore(flags); // enable LINUX mask -> NONE
Then the nested code that re-enables PMUs will not replay PMU interrupt
until the outer irq is re-enabled. I don't *think* this is a problem,
but it probably should be commented.
Which brings us to arch_local_irq_restore() (from another patch):
@@ -208,7 +209,7 @@ notrace void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long
en)
/* Write the new soft-enabled value */
set_soft_enabled(en);
- if (!en)
+ if (en == IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_LINUX)
return;
/*
* From this point onward, we can take interrupts, preempt,
I think this is a bit buggy for some cases of nested disables. For the
above it is okay, but if we have:
local_irq_and_pmu_save(flags);
local_irq_and_pmu_save(flags);
local_irq_and_pmu_restore(flags);
local_irq_and_pmu_restore(flags);
The first restore will restore LINUX|PMU mask, which will not be caught
by this check.
Testing instead for non-zero (any IRQ bits masked) should work. We
should
probably also add an IRQ_DEBUG_SUPPORT check to ensure LINUX bit is
always
one of the outer-most bits to be cleared (theoretically we could support
Just sent out the newer version of the patchset with most of the
comments addressed.
But I am not sure about this comment. IIUC, will something like this
will do?
Sorry. Sent a wrong patch before along with the question..
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DEBUG_SUPPORT
WARN_ONCE (en & (en & IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_LINUX),
"soft_enabled transition to Unsupported state\n");
#endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
index a02c6a3bc6fa..af0c08aefbcf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
@@ -209,6 +209,11 @@ notrace void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long
en)
unsigned char irq_happened;
unsigned int replay;
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DEBUG_SUPPORT
+ WARN_ONCE (en & (en & local_paca->soft_enabled),
+ "soft_enabled transition to Unsupported state\n");
+#endif
+
/* Write the new soft-enabled value */
set_soft_enabled(en);
Maddy
masking other bits without masking LINUX, but let's disallow that
until a
compelling use case shows up).
Thanks,
Nick
