On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 07:42:47AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > hi, > > I had discussion with Ingo about the state of this patchset > > and there's one more requirement from his side - to split > > event files into per topic files > > Thanks Jiri. > > > > I made some initial changes over latest Sukadev's branch > > and came up with something like this: > > Did you just split it by the "Topic" fields?
yep > > > > > $ find pmu-events/arch/x86/ > > pmu-events/arch/x86/ > > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core > > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Memory.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Virtual-Memory.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Cache.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Pipeline.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Floating-point.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Other.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/mapfile.csv > > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core > > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Memory.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Virtual-Memory.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Cache.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Pipeline.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Floating-point.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Other.json > > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Frontend.json > > > > so let's have a discussion if this is acceptable for you guys > > Splitting is fine for me, as long as it's scriptable. > > I already have some scripts to generate the perf json files, > can update them to split. yep, there's split-json.py script earlier in the perf/json branch > > > > > I've already made some changes in pmu-events/* to support > > this hierarchy to see how bad the change would be.. and > > it's not that bad ;-) > > Everything has to be automated, please no manual changes. sure so, if you're ok with the layout, how do you want to proceed further? thanks, jirka
