On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:24:32AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: > So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: > > > > > > Hrm. Can we leave this one until after 1.1? Since it adds new > > syntax, I think it would be worth cogitating a bit longer. > > Double hrm. > > Scott, can you remind us why this feature was requested > off the U-Boot list, please? I'm trying to decide if we > really do want to get it into the 1.1 release.
U-boot wants it because they're planning on using device trees as their new multi-image format. I implemented it for a similar, but different reason -- passing guest device trees to a hypervisor within a hypervisor config tree. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
