* Mel Gorman <[email protected]> [2016-08-04 15:09:34]:

> > 
> > Suggested-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
> 
> I didn't suggest this specifically. While it happens to be safe on ppc64,
> it potentially overwrites any future caller of set_dma_reserve. While the
> only other one is for the e820 map, it may be better to change the API
> to inc_dma_reserve?
> 
> It's also unfortunate that it's called dma_reserve because it has
> nothing to do with DMA or ZONE_DMA. inc_kernel_reserve may be more
> appropriate?

Yup Agree. Will redo and send out.

> 
> -- 
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

Reply via email to