On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:16:34PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > We could instead just search for all nodes that are compatible with > "ibm,opal-flash". We do that for i2c, see opal_i2c_create_devs(). > > Is there a particular reason not to do that?
I'm actually surprised that this is preferred. Jeremy mentioned something similar, but I guess I just don't like the idea of finding devices in weird places in the tree. Then again, if we can't trust the DT we're in bigger trouble than erroneous flash nodes =). If we really just want to find compatible nodes anywhere, let's simplify i2c and pdev_init into one function and make that behavior consistent with this new patch. - Jack _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
