On Saturday 05 January 2008, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > This is probably not specific enough. I'm rather sure that someone at > > > IBM has implemented an i2c chip that this driver doesn't support. Maybe > > > > > > .compatible = "ibm,405-iic" > > > > > > or similar would be a better thing to check for. > > > > .compatible = "ibm,4xx-iic" > > > > please, since 405 and 440 have the same I2C controller. > > But that's not how compatible properties work -- they should not > contain wildcards. If you have different devices that are > backwards compatible, you should list the older one in all > newer devices, e.g. the 440 can list that it is compatible > with both ibm,405-iic and ibm,440-iic. If there was an earlier > 401 that had iic as well, you may even want to include that > in the device tree.
OK. Thanks for clarifying. Best regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
